Michael Arrington of TechCrunch was one of the first people to express their negative thoughts about PayPerPost. His point dealt with the credibility of post. Some other bloggers expressed their thoughts saying like how can bloggers blog the truth if they can be paid to give false truths about a product or service endorsement? Before the negative bloggers say that, they should tell that to TVShopping channels. And someone that is not paid for the post itself in their blogs, how can they say their post is true of not? It is based only on their own judgement.
Even with the negative publicity from some bloggers, PayPerPost still continued on and I knew it was going to make more money. As I myself continued with the PayPerPost program where I signed up as a blogger and also tried being an advertiser, I just saw the increase of advertisers everyday. It kept growing that you can start blogging about almost any topic and you will get to find a post related to it in PayPerPost.
Michael Arrington blogs once again about PayPerPost, not much negative news about the blog advertising was tied to his post this time, as he highlights the $3Million raised from investors. It looks like PayPerPost is really on its way up even with the earlier negative bloggers who have contradicted the system.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Leave a Reply